Permitted development: CLOPUD: Class E, Part 1: when is a building incidental

Inspector’s appeal decision

Lane v Bromsgrove District Council (appeal under section 195)

15 April 2019

One in which I acted for the Council, the inspector concluded that the outbuildingĀ 

“….would not be required in its entirety for incidental purposes. In addition, the size of the building would be much larger than would genuinely and reasonably be required to serve its specified incidental purposes. As such it would not be permitted development by virtue of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class E of the GPDO.”

and dismissed the appeal

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

I accept that my given data and my IP address is sent to a server in the USA only for the purpose of spam prevention through the Akismet program.More information on Akismet and GDPR.